According to consensus-building models, what is typically expected from dissenting faculty members?

In consensus-building models, the focus is on collaboration and collective decision-making. The expectation from dissenting faculty members is that while they may not fully agree with a proposal, they should not obstruct the process. Instead, they are encouraged to support the implementation of a decision that has been reached collectively. This approach fosters a healthy environment for collaboration and respects diverse viewpoints while still moving forward with a unified effort.

The emphasis on dissenting members agreeing not to obstruct but to support implementation allows for a balance between differing opinions and the necessity of progress. It acknowledges the importance of inclusivity in discourse while recognizing that complete agreement may not always be attainable.

Other options may suggest total compliance or allow for opting out, which would undermine the collaborative spirit essential to consensus-building. The model values the participation of all members, including those who dissent, but frames their role in a way that ensures the organization can still advance effectively.